U.S. advocacy coalition urges NHTSA to abandon rollback of fuel-economy rules
Read Our Expert Analysis
Create an account or login for free to unlock our expert analysis and key takeaways for this development.
By continuing, you agree to receive marketing communications and our weekly newsletter. You can opt-out at any time.
Recommended for you
EPA vehicle-rule rollbacks create net cost to Americans, agency analysis shows
The EPA’s regulatory rollbacks on light-vehicle greenhouse-gas standards produce a net economic loss according to the agency’s own impact study; the agency has also submitted a related proposal to OMB to rescind the 2009 endangerment finding, deepening legal uncertainty. EPA tables show about $1.1 trillion in upfront vehicle price reductions versus roughly $1.5 trillion in higher fuel and ancillary costs through 2055.
Energy Department Removes EV credit tied to 'fuel content factor'
The U.S. Energy Department said it will remove the calculation known as the fuel content factor , which had given electric vehicles added weight in regulatory fuel-efficiency accounting. The move, prompted by a federal appeals court ruling, comes as part of a wider reworking of vehicle efficiency rules and could shift the balance of incentives toward market and state-level measures.
European Commission urged to preserve 2025 hydrogen rules
A coalition of environmental groups and low-carbon fuel producers is asking the European Commission to avoid accelerating a review of key renewable hydrogen rules before the planned 2028 date. They argue early changes would undermine investor confidence, destabilize electricity grids, and put EU climate targets at greater risk.
Trump Administration Repeals EPA Endangerment Finding, Steering U.S. Auto Market Toward Trucks and Hybrids
Removal of the EPA endangerment finding (now in OMB review) plus Congress’s elimination of CAFE penalties and parallel agency accounting changes (DOE’s fuel‑content factor removal) erode the federal compliance floor that supported large-scale EV economics. Automakers face clearer near‑term commercial incentives to favour higher‑margin trucks, SUVs and smaller‑battery hybrids even as the EPA’s own regulatory-impact tables flag larger lifetime fuel and health costs—creating legal, market and international frictions over the next 6–12 months.
U.S. proposal to require 100% domestic content for highway EV chargers risks stalling NEVI rollout
The U.S. Department of Transportation has proposed eliminating a waiver and raising the domestic-content threshold for federally funded EV chargers from 55% to 100%, a change that could delay installations funded through the NEVI program. Advocates and state plaintiffs say the move undermines a court order protecting NEVI funding and will slow deployment, while proponents argue it advances onshoring of manufacturing.
Advocates Move to Vacate DOE Order Keeping Colorado Coal Unit Online
A coalition of environmental and public-interest groups has filed for rehearing to overturn a Department of Energy order that kept Craig Station Unit 1 from retiring, arguing the directive lacked a legitimate emergency basis and will raise costs and pollution. The groups warn the 90-day mandate shifts economic risk onto ratepayers, undermines state planning, and is likely to prompt litigation if the DOE denies the rehearing request.
US rollback on emissions authority collides with China’s first post‑pandemic CO2 dip
A recent US administrative move reduced the federal agency’s power to regulate major greenhouse‑gas sources, while independent analysis indicates China’s national CO2 output fell by about 0.3% last year—their first decline after the pandemic years. At the same time Beijing has ordered large industrial emitters to disclose audited greenhouse‑gas data by a late‑March deadline, a step that could strengthen the data backbone for expanding China’s carbon market and shape near‑term mitigation prospects.
EPA moves to zero out statistical value of life in rulemaking
The EPA has repriced life at zero for internal rule cost-benefit accounting, a change that instantly erodes the monetary basis for health-focused regulations and helps make other deregulatory moves look cost‑beneficial on paper. The adjustment comes amid a coordinated package of rollbacks — including a proposed repeal of the 2009 endangerment finding and vehicle greenhouse-gas standard changes — where agency tables show large, long‑term costs that monetaryizing avoided mortality would otherwise capture, creating a tension between headline savings and embedded harms and likely sparking litigation and international credibility costs.