US tariffs squeeze game-industry finances, survey shows
Read Our Expert Analysis
Create an account or login for free to unlock our expert analysis and key takeaways for this development.
By continuing, you agree to receive marketing communications and our weekly newsletter. You can opt-out at any time.
Recommended for you
Toy industry braces for Supreme Court tariff ruling
US toy manufacturers and importers remain jittery as a Supreme Court decision on large-scale import duties could change costs and legal exposure. A recent cross‑sector industry survey of about 200 executives found roughly four in ten firms reporting tangible tariff impacts, underscoring that the levies are already an operational factor for many consumer-goods companies.
Canada finance minister warns US tariffs likely to stay
Canada's finance minister says a baseline US tariff regime is now probable, with a newly announced 10% global levy and a temporary statutory cap of 15% . The shift — amplified by US warnings over a separate Canada‑China tariff compact — raises immediate export cost risks for sectors that send roughly 75% of output to the US and accelerates Ottawa's push to diversify markets.
EIB: EU Firms Absorb U.S. Tariffs but Stumble Inside Single Market
An EIB survey of roughly 13,000 firms finds exporters largely managing the new 15% U.S. import tariff , yet 62% report friction selling across EU borders; removing internal barriers could lift investment intensity by about 10% .
Tariffs, Resilience and Risk: Why U.S. Growth Has So Far Weathered Heavy Import Levies
A year after steep import duties were rolled out, growth has continued instead of collapsing as many forecast; negotiated rollbacks, exemptions and adaptive behavior from firms and foreign suppliers muted the immediate hit. Yet fresh data — including a sharp November swing in the goods deficit and accelerated rerouting of supply chains — underline that the resilience is conditional and could give way to higher prices, margin pressure and a more fragmented global trade landscape.
UK Faces Largest Tariff Shock After U.S. Ruling
A U.S. Supreme Court decision narrowed the executive's emergency tariff authority, removing a route that had left the UK on a lower reciprocal schedule and exposing British importers to an effective move toward a 15% baseline. The ruling produces an immediate UK-centered cost shock, but legal and administrative wrinkles — other statutory routes and large customs receipts — mean the final tariff landscape will remain contested and politically fraught.
ECB’s Panetta: Tariffs Have Hit the US Hardest
ECB Governing Council member Fabio Panetta says recent U.S. tariffs shifted most of the economic cost onto American shoulders — with foreign exporters absorbing a small share (~10%) and consumers and firms shouldering the bulk — a pattern that raises near‑term inflationary pressure in some places while depressing demand in others, complicating central-bank trade‑offs.
Trump-era tariff shock reshaped global trade — what comes next
A recent court decision removed one statutory route the White House used to impose targeted emergency tariffs, trimming a subset of the additional levies that followed 2024 policy moves. But sizeable remaining duties, large fiscal receipts and unresolved legal and operational questions mean higher-than-normal import costs and continued trade volatility for businesses and partners.
Trump Tariffs Strain Canadian Steel Firms
A sudden 25% U.S. steel tariff — initially imposed under 2018 emergency trade powers — landed on a southern Ontario mill days after it changed hands, producing acute cash‑flow pressure and production delays. Subsequent policy waves and legal pivots (including later headline levies of roughly 10% with effective stacking to ~15% under statute-based routes) have prolonged uncertainty, demonstrating how differing legal tools and timing amplify microeconomic stress for small cross‑border manufacturers.