CLARITY Act gains momentum as Coinbase signals compromise
CLARITY Act advances as industry talks narrow disagreements
Momentum for a major crypto market-structure bill has accelerated amid intensive, clause-level negotiations that aim to bridge long-standing disagreements between banks, exchanges and lawmakers. Sen. Bernie Moreno estimated a potential congressional resolution in roughly one month, while executives and policy aides described recent forums as shifting the debate from broad principles to committee-ready drafting.
At a recent convening hosted by World Liberty Financial, participants from exchanges, banks and Capitol Hill focused on technical fixes to preserve bank funding models while enabling compliant on-ramps for crypto platforms. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, who had earlier withdrawn public support over restrictive language, said negotiators are now exploring compromise pathways that would clarify regulator roles and consumer protections — reducing a key public obstacle to progress.
The legislative calendar has been uneven: a planned committee markup was pulled after wavering backers, and negotiators have shifted to producing narrowly tailored amendments that could be folded into future markups. The White House has organized a targeted convening through its digital-assets advisory channels to press for clause-level compromises, and some Senate staffers are weighing procedural levers — including conditioning an effective date on the Commodity Futures Trading Commission having a quorum — to align confirmation and legislative timelines.
Market indicators have reflected the uncertainty and renewed momentum. Decentralized prediction markets briefly bid up the CLARITY Act’s chances (Polymarket odds spiked before normalizing), while spot crypto products have continued to register inflows as firms balance commercial demand against policy risk.
Core pressure points persist: whether stablecoins may carry repeat reward or yield-like features, and which federal agency will have primary supervisory authority. Those two items are dominating private bargaining and have shaped how backers draft compromise language acceptable to both banks and crypto firms.
Procedurally, negotiators are now focused on generating committee-ready text — particularly for Agriculture or Banking subcommittees — and converting private assurances into enforceable statutory clauses rather than voluntary commitments. Lawmakers and administration officials have emphasized interagency coordination between the SEC and CFTC as a way to reduce overlapping jurisdictional signals.
For industry participants, the immediate consequence is operational: many project teams are pausing large rollouts or tightening communications while text is settled, even as larger incumbents and well-capitalized firms continue to press forward with alternative, regulation-resilient builds. International developments, including Europe’s MiCA rollout, are nudging some teams to prioritize jurisdictions with clearer rules.
What happens next will be driven by drafting milestones, White House convenings, and the timing of committee markups and confirmation votes. If negotiators can translate narrow, technically precise compromises — limiting harmful yield mechanics and clarifying supervisory roles — the bill could quickly regain momentum and materially reduce litigation and operational risk for custodians, banks and exchanges.
- Participants: exchange executives, bank representatives, lawmakers, White House and agency officials
- Primary disputes: yield-like stablecoin products, regulator designation, custody definitions
- Near-term mechanics: clause-level drafting, targeted White House convenings, committee-ready amendments
Read Our Expert Analysis
Create an account or login for free to unlock our expert analysis and key takeaways for this development.
By continuing, you agree to receive marketing communications and our weekly newsletter. You can opt-out at any time.
Recommended for you
Rick Edelman Urges Compromise on Stablecoin Yield to Salvage Clarity Act Progress
Rick Edelman warned that pressing the fight over stablecoin yield risks derailing momentum on the Clarity Act and urged negotiators to accept tradeoffs to secure regulatory certainty. He argued that banks currently hold procedural and political leverage, and that narrowly tailored compromise would rapidly restore market confidence and mobilize capital.
CLARITY Act at Risk if Senate Misses April Window
The CLARITY Act faces a compressed legislative runway: committee action in the next seven weeks is critical to preserve a 2026 floor path, but a pulled markup and competing Senate priorities make delay likely. White House clause‑level convenings and negotiators’ confidence that text can be produced quickly conflict with market and analyst projections that now price multi‑year slippage, creating divergent timelines and heightened commercial downside risk.
White House Proposes Limits on Stablecoin Rewards in CLARITY Act Talks
The White House convened banking and crypto representatives to narrow stablecoin rewards language in stalled CLARITY Act negotiations, pressing a trade-off that would allow rewards only for transaction activity , not balances. Other reporting notes the session ran more than two hours and that negotiators have asked parties to submit concrete drafting proposals within weeks as the White House shifts from public signaling to clause-level bargaining.
JPMorgan Says Clarity Act Could Unlock Institutional Crypto Capital
JPMorgan argues the proposed Clarity Act would resolve oversight disputes, allowing large allocators to re-enter crypto and accelerating tokenization; key bill features include a $75M simplified registration cap and a Jan. 1, 2026 grandfather cutoff for selected tokens.
Trump pushes banks toward a deal on CLARITY Act deadlock
President Trump’s public call for banks to compromise on the CLARITY Act amplified pressure on negotiations, but White House convenings have already shifted talks from rhetoric to clause-level bargaining. TD Cowen and other advisers warn a single social post is unlikely to resolve the stalemate — personnel moves at the SEC and CFTC, clause drafting (including a possible transaction‑only rewards model), and interagency tradeoffs will determine whether momentum converts to statute.
Coinbase Seeks Protect Stablecoin Revenue as Genius Act Rulemaking Looms
Coinbase is intensifying Washington outreach to defend a fast-growing stablecoin revenue stream after the new stablecoin statute passed; Bloomberg Intelligence projects that stream could expand two- to seven-fold if token use in payments accelerates. The push is occurring amid procedural uncertainty — paused markups, White House convenings and pushback from banks over yield-like products — and Coinbase is simultaneously testing branded stablecoin tooling that ties its commercial fate to how regulators define custody, permissible rewards and settlement roles.
Coinbase’s Brian Armstrong Meets Trump as Market-Structure Fight Reignites
Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong held a private meeting with President Trump hours before the president publicly pressed Congress to advance market-structure legislation, underscoring heightened White House involvement as negotiators work clause‑by‑clause. The engagement amplifies leverage over disputed stablecoin ‘reward’ language and arrives amid parallel White House convenings, a scheduled Agriculture Committee markup (Jan. 29, 2026) and procedural bargaining over conditioning an effective date on CFTC quorum votes.
HSBC: Coinbase Withdrawal Won’t Kill U.S. Crypto Market-Structure Push
Coinbase publicly withdrew support for a congressional market-structure draft, creating friction for near-term markups, but HSBC analysts say a narrower, committee-level compromise could still deliver the statutory certainty institutions seek. The White House has scheduled a targeted convening next week—organized by its digital-assets advisory council—to try to resolve a specific dispute over reward-like incentives tied to stablecoins, a move that could produce language suitable for quick committee amendments.