White House Proposes Limits on Stablecoin Rewards in CLARITY Act Talks
White House narrows stablecoin rewards in Senate negotiations
Senior White House officials convened representatives from the cryptocurrency sector, trade groups and the banking industry to try to hammer out clause-level language on whether stablecoins may carry recurring, yield-like rewards — a central sticking point holding up the CLARITY Act in the Senate.
Administration advisers and participants described a concrete proposal that would confine third‑party reward mechanics to activity‑based payments — rewards tied to transactions or other customer actions — and bar interest‑like payouts on held balances, a move intended to reduce deposit‑replacement risk for banks.
Several sources characterized the session as substantive and long: attendees reported it ran more than two hours, and the White House has urged the parties to deliver specific drafting proposals within weeks to convert private assurances into committee‑ready text.
The convening was the latest in an intensive stretch of contacts — the White House counts this as the third session in 16 days with banks and crypto firms — reflecting a shift from public posturing to clause‑level bargaining and closer SEC–CFTC coordination aimed at limiting overlapping jurisdictional signals.
Executives from platforms including Coinbase and Ripple participated, even as other reporting has highlighted that Coinbase previously paused or withdrew a public endorsement of an earlier draft — underscoring a split between private engagement and public positioning.
No final statutory language was agreed, and negotiators face competing procedural pressures: markups have been delayed after wavering backers, and some staffers are weighing mechanisms — such as conditioning the statute’s effective date on the Commodity Futures Trading Commission achieving a quorum — that would tie confirmation fights to legislative bargaining.
Outside the rooms, industry behavior is mixed. Some firms are tightening or pausing product rollouts pending clarity, while spot crypto products have continued to attract inflows; international developments like Europe’s MiCA regime are also influencing where teams prioritize deployments.
If lawmakers adopt a transaction‑only reward model, custodial exchanges and wallets will likely redesign offerings toward activity‑linked fees and rebates, preserving revenue without paying interest on balances — a shift that could compress margins for smaller competitors and amplify the role of regulated intermediaries.
Practically, a transaction‑only rule is administratively straightforward but technically porous: platforms could engineer micro‑transaction schemes or rebating loops that mimic balance yields unless the statute includes explicit anti‑avoidance tests and telemetry thresholds, a concern flagged by negotiators and policy analysts.
With limited weeks to turn executive‑level understandings into precise statutory clauses that can survive committee scrutiny, expect sustained shuttle diplomacy, interagency coordination, and a focus on narrowly tailored amendments in the near term as lawmakers try to balance financial‑stability safeguards with industry competitiveness.
Read Our Expert Analysis
Create an account or login for free to unlock our expert analysis and key takeaways for this development.
By continuing, you agree to receive marketing communications and our weekly newsletter. You can opt-out at any time.
Recommended for you
U.S. White House Brokers Crypto Talks as Stablecoin Yield Fight Stalls Progress
The White House convened senior industry and banking representatives to try to bridge a standoff over whether stablecoins should be allowed to offer yield, but negotiators left without resolving the core dispute and were pressed to deliver concrete drafting proposals within weeks. The effort comes amid wavering industry endorsements, paused committee activity and tactical bargaining over items such as conditioning the law’s effective date on CFTC staffing, all of which heighten the odds of delay absent rapid technical compromises.
Rick Edelman Urges Compromise on Stablecoin Yield to Salvage Clarity Act Progress
Rick Edelman warned that pressing the fight over stablecoin yield risks derailing momentum on the Clarity Act and urged negotiators to accept tradeoffs to secure regulatory certainty. He argued that banks currently hold procedural and political leverage, and that narrowly tailored compromise would rapidly restore market confidence and mobilize capital.
Trump pushes banks toward a deal on CLARITY Act deadlock
President Trump’s public call for banks to compromise on the CLARITY Act amplified pressure on negotiations, but White House convenings have already shifted talks from rhetoric to clause-level bargaining. TD Cowen and other advisers warn a single social post is unlikely to resolve the stalemate — personnel moves at the SEC and CFTC, clause drafting (including a possible transaction‑only rewards model), and interagency tradeoffs will determine whether momentum converts to statute.
Sen. Angela Alsobrooks Seeks Deal to Limit Stablecoin Yields
Sen. Angela Alsobrooks and Sen. Thom Tillis are negotiating bipartisan language to curb exchange-paid, interest‑like stablecoin payouts as White House and agency actors press clause‑level compromises; banks and regulators favor treating recurring payouts as deposit‑equivalents while the crypto industry pushes for narrowly crafted, activity‑based reward rules — a split that will shape enforcement scope and where yield-seeking migrates.
CLARITY Act gains momentum as Coinbase signals compromise
Sen. Bernie Moreno says the CLARITY Act could clear Congress within about a month as Coinbase’s Brian Armstrong signals a renewed path to agreement. Lawmakers and industry continue clause-level bargaining after a pulled markup; the White House and committees have convened targeted discussions to resolve sticking points over stablecoin yields and regulator designation.
CLARITY Act at Risk if Senate Misses April Window
The CLARITY Act faces a compressed legislative runway: committee action in the next seven weeks is critical to preserve a 2026 floor path, but a pulled markup and competing Senate priorities make delay likely. White House clause‑level convenings and negotiators’ confidence that text can be produced quickly conflict with market and analyst projections that now price multi‑year slippage, creating divergent timelines and heightened commercial downside risk.
Davos Cold Shoulder: Big U.S. Banks Push Back on Coinbase Over Stablecoin Rules
At Davos, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong was met with curt and dismissive responses from several leading U.S. bank chiefs as he lobbied against language in an active Senate stablecoin bill. The exchanges at the World Economic Forum track with a broader, paused CLARITY Act process — including a looming Agriculture Committee markup and a White House convening — that will decide whether non-bank platforms can offer repeat, interest‑like payouts on stablecoins.
Coinbase Seeks Protect Stablecoin Revenue as Genius Act Rulemaking Looms
Coinbase is intensifying Washington outreach to defend a fast-growing stablecoin revenue stream after the new stablecoin statute passed; Bloomberg Intelligence projects that stream could expand two- to seven-fold if token use in payments accelerates. The push is occurring amid procedural uncertainty — paused markups, White House convenings and pushback from banks over yield-like products — and Coinbase is simultaneously testing branded stablecoin tooling that ties its commercial fate to how regulators define custody, permissible rewards and settlement roles.