US job growth trails as AI investment and immigration cuts reshape the labor market
Why hiring hasn’t matched output
Output continued to climb last year, but growth decelerated: the economy expanded at an annual rate close to 2.2% in 2025, down from about 2.8% the prior year. Firms simultaneously poured capital into artificial intelligence projects — buying equipment, funding R&D, and building data centers — which lifted measured output even as new payroll creation remained modest.
The jobs picture is muted. Aggregate payroll additions were tiny relative to past cycles, roughly 181,000 positions for the year, while the headline unemployment rate hovered near 4.3%. Monthly data are noisy: January’s nonfarm payrolls rose by about 130,000, but revisions trimmed prior months and methodological changes to the BLS birth‑and‑death adjustment and pending household population-control updates mean single-month readings should be interpreted cautiously.
At the same time, a deeper reconfiguration is visible beneath the headline: roughly 1.8 million Americans have been jobless for six months or longer — about one in four of the unemployed — pointing to weaker hiring rather than elevated separations. Corporate trackers logged more than 1.2 million job‑cut notifications across 2025, and planned layoff announcements in January exceeded 108,435, even as planned hires fell to only 5,306 in that month.
Two forces are intersecting. First, rapid AI deployment and outsized capital commitments are substituting capital for some routine labor and redirecting income toward shareholders and higher‑income households. Industry estimates put global AI infrastructure spending near $1.5 trillion in 2025; concentrated procurement through a small set of hyperscalers amplifies capital intensity and vendor lock‑in, while delays and permitting frictions have already reshaped about $64 billion of planned U.S. data‑center projects.
Second, immigration flows that historically supplied many workers have fallen sharply — forecasts point to net inflows near 160,000 versus roughly 1.1 million in typical years — shrinking the pool of available workers and eroding the local consumer demand that encourages hiring in certain regions and sectors.
- Researchers estimate AI‑related spending added about 0.4 percentage points to GDP last year, but much of the spending is capital‑intensive and accrues to owners of capital rather than wage earners.
- A research strand warns roughly $1 trillion of current consumption is supported by asset appreciation and capital flows rather than broad‑based wage growth, a gap that could reverse if investment expectations falter.
- Entry‑level opportunities have been squeezed: postings for early‑career roles have declined materially (entry‑level listings down roughly 35% versus early 2023), lengthening hiring cycles and increasing applicant competition for each opening.
The result is a growth pattern sometimes described as an economy that’s expanding with only modest job creation — growth that benefits capital owners faster than many workers. Sectoral outcomes diverge: manufacturing and agriculture report persistent shortages tied to reduced foreign‑born employment and higher input or trade‑policy costs, while many tech employers shift toward a smaller set of durable, AI‑capable roles even as they announce high‑profile layoffs in other divisions.
Corporate behavior has shifted toward a “low‑hire, low‑fire” posture in many firms — preserving payrolls but throttling new entry and lateral movement — which can mask micro‑level slack and raise long‑term unemployment risks. For jobseekers, longer searches and reduced early‑career openings translate into pay compression and scarring: rehired workers often accept pay cuts and prolonged unemployment can erode skills.
Policymakers face a trade‑off. Sustained capital investment in new technologies can raise long‑run productivity, yet transitions without scaled retraining, portable credentials, streamlined immigration for shortage occupations, and measures to reduce vendor concentration risk persistent dislocation and uneven regional outcomes. Watch for debates over targeted hiring supports, immigration channels tied to sectoral needs, competition policy for hyperscalers, and fiscal measures to bolster wage‑backed demand.
Read Our Expert Analysis
Create an account or login for free to unlock our expert analysis and key takeaways for this development.
By continuing, you agree to receive marketing communications and our weekly newsletter. You can opt-out at any time.
Recommended for you
Immigration Crackdown, Tariffs and Automation Are Cooling U.S. Labor Demand
Interior immigration enforcement, declining net migration and rising trade barriers have removed workers and consumers from local economies, cooling hiring even as some new roles went to native-born workers. Demographic slowdown and a “low‑hire, low‑fire” corporate stance — highlighted by economists’ employment indicators — suggest weaker hiring momentum that will push firms toward automation and complicate fiscal and regional planning.
US Tech Job Market in 2026: AI-Driven Disruption and New Opportunity
AI is reshaping hiring: it is compressing many entry-level, repeatable roles while creating strong demand for practitioners who can apply, secure, and govern AI in production environments. The labor-market effects are being amplified and unevenly distributed by concentrated infrastructure spending, shifting data‑center finance patterns, and an intense political fight over national AI rules that will shape where compute — and thus many new jobs — locate.
US economist: AI-driven investment is inflating consumption that wages don’t support
An economist argues that surges in AI capital spending have pushed consumer demand about $1 trillion higher than wage income alone would support, creating a vulnerability if investment-led demand reverses. Policymakers are experimenting with income-support pilots and urged to combine those measures with supply‑side reforms — public open infrastructure, competition rules and standards to reduce vendor lock‑in — to smooth any adjustment and limit distributional harm.
U.S. job gains accelerate in January as unemployment falls to 4.3%
U.S. payrolls rose by 130,000 in January and the unemployment rate slipped to 4.3%, stronger than many forecasts but muddied by statistical changes at the BLS. At the same time, an outplacement firm reported a spike in announced corporate layoffs (108,435) and a collapse in planned hires, signaling downside risk to payroll growth in coming months.
U.S. Population Momentum Weakens as Immigration Falls Short
New government figures show U.S. population growth has slowed sharply, driven largely by a drop in net migration rather than a sudden change in birth rates. The shift reduces workforce expansion and raises fresh policy questions about immigration, economic growth, and regional demographics.
Raphael Bostic: Fed Faces Risk of Higher Structural Unemployment as AI Cuts Labor Needs
Atlanta Fed chief Raphael Bostic warns that widespread corporate adoption of AI could raise the U.S. natural unemployment rate, limiting the Federal Reserve’s ability to offset job losses with rate cuts. Other senior Fed voices offer contrasting scenarios — from a broad productivity dividend that could lift r* and support tighter policy to nominees who see disinflationary scope for cuts — making the speed, breadth and concentration of AI adoption the decisive factor for markets and fiscal planners.
Claudia Sahm: U.S. Labor Market Has Rewired Itself — Policy Tools May Be Outdated
Claudia Sahm warns the U.S. labor market has undergone structural change since the pandemic, producing persistently low hiring even as headline indicators remain benign. Her recession signal sits below the trigger, but she urges policymakers to focus on slow-moving labor shifts and institutional independence rather than conventional recession metrics.
Long-term unemployment becomes entrenched as US hiring cools
Long-term joblessness in the US is rising even as the headline unemployment rate hovers near 4.3% — driven by sharply weaker hiring, a surge in announced layoffs, demographic and immigration shifts that shrink both worker and consumer pools, and faster adoption of automation and AI. These demand-side changes are lengthening searches, compressing wages for rehires, and limiting lateral mobility, particularly for early-career and visa-dependent candidates.